1)
I think that the boundaries for doing what you do was a bit surprising. Even though entrepreneurship is about doing productive things to progress it was surprising to see it coupled with degrading affect. Moral and ethics must clearly be considered when doing something even if its for "the better".
2)
The reading per se was not very confusing but there were some diagram that were. "Classifying decisions using a conceptual framework" was a bit confusing and hard to read.
3)
Are there any ideas that can be justified when they don't correspond with morals and ethics? I would also ask if he agrees with that fact that those who operate unethically and unnoticed eventually get discovered?
4)
I don't think the author was incorrect about anything so I agreed with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment